[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101001152715.GA5338@nowhere>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:27:19 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Wu, Xia" <xia.wu@...el.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhu, Daniel" <daniel.zhu@...el.com>,
"Wang, Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: unnecessary timer interrupt of slab.c and bdi tasks when the
system is in sleep state
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:20:22AM -0700, Van De Ven, Arjan wrote:
>
> > > the slab timer is already deferable... which means it won't hit while
> > the system is completely idle.
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean exactly. The slab work seems to be scheduled
> > strictly
> > periodically, unless the cpu goes offline. But I can't find any nohz-
> > wise adaptation.
> >
>
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK_DEFERRABLE(reap_work, cache_reap);
>
> that will cause it to only run when the cpu is actually idle...
Aah ok, I missed that. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists