[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CA567DB.4000208@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:47:23 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, dave@....org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] cpufreq: unnecesary double free in pcc_cpufreq_do_osc
Hi Dave,
On 30.9.2010 23.06, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:59:51PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> > > @@ -379,6 +379,8 @@ static int __init pcc_cpufreq_do_osc(acpi_handle *handle)
> > > if (!(supported& 0x1))
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > out_free:
> > > kfree(output.pointer);
> > > return ret;
> >
> > Where is the double free here? I can't see it. I do see memory leaks
> > happening in error handling paths of pcc_cpufreq_do_osc() which makes
> > me think we need something like the attached patch.
>
> I think Dave's patch is correct. There's a kfree(output.pointer) at line 359.
> If we fall all the way through without hitting any of the return -ENODEVs,
> we end up doing a 2nd kfree in the out_free:
There's a second call to acpi_evaluate_object() which takes "output" as
its argument and allocates more memory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists