linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-trivial tree with the hfsplus tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:47:40 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-trivial tree with the hfsplus
 tree

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the bkl-trivial tree got a conflict in
fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c between commits
94744567fef9602c3d8218a1d8f58c04cce354f6 ("hfsplus: split hfsplus_ioctl")
and 6333816ade7e04a96ec0a34a8378c455e4f7c4dd ("hfsplus: protect setflags
using i_mutex") from the hfsplus tree and commit
65c7297b0322453d238b2d23918a3a8b3a223c3b ("drivers: autoconvert trivial
BKL users to private mutex") from the bkl-trivial tree.

The second of the hfsplus tree commits seems to supercede the bkl-trivial
one, so I used that.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped