linux-kernel - Very bad latency on x86 desktop when a process is swapping: Am I expecting too much?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <i8b556$v3$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date:	Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:55:17 -0700
From:	walt <w41ter@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Very bad latency on x86 desktop when a process is swapping: Am I
 expecting too much?

Hi lkml,

This is most likely a corner case for the average linux desktop user, but
it's very annoying for me and I'd like to get a feel for what I 'should' be
expecting.

I track the mozilla-firefox-trunk sources from their hg repository every day,
and there is one place in the build where roughly 20-30 large libraries are
linked, all in one giant gcc command.

All those libraries won't fit in my puny 1GB of RAM, so the machine starts to
swap, naturally.

During the 2-3 minutes that all those libraries are being linked, the machine
is truly unusable for any normal lightweight desktop task like reading email.
The swap usage tops out at about 15% of available swap space.

I know the problem would go away if install more RAM, but that's not my real
question.

What should I realistically expect from a desktop workstation under these
fairly uncommon conditions?

Many thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/