lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:54:00 +0530
From:	Rahul Ruikar <rahul.ruikar@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
	Rahul Ruikar <rahul.ruikar@...il.com>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, nm127@...email.hu,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND/PATCH] usb: gadget: goku_udc: Fix error path

Dan,

Following things I tried to do with this change.
there can be 3 cases where one need to handle device_register()
1) reaching error path but device_register() is never called..( ie,
error occurred before calling device_register() function call, in this
case "dev->reg_status" will have value "0" and in error handler
device_unregister() or put_device() will not be called.

2) error occurred at device_register() ( ie. it fails and calls error
handler, this way "dev->reg_status" will have value "2" and in error
handler, based on this value "put_device() will be called.

3) error occured after device_register() success. ( ie, error occured
due to some other function, ) in this case "dev->reg_status" will have
value "1" and in error handler, based on this value
"device_unregister" will be called.

but anyways someone has now proposed to change it to new usb
interface, so this patch is of no use now.

Thanks
Rahul Ruikar





On 4 October 2010 17:52, Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:29:00AM +0530, Rahul Ruikar wrote:
>> call put_device() when device_register() fails.
>>
>
> Sorry I didn't realize what you were trying to do here.  This is not
> correct at all.
>
> The right thing is to fix device_register() to call put_device() itself.
> It's a bit involved, because all the callers will need to be audited but
> someone is working on this I think.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists