[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinsc=DqQwnR18McRP8fLei=GHWV1yykCcYDUCzv@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:08:46 +0200
From: Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Bug #16891] Kernel panic while loading intel module during boot
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>> I'll provide this patch here in the meantime in case anyone is interested.
>
> Thanks for the update and the patch.
>
> Well, I wonder who's going to merge it?
>
I'm not sure is going to be merged because most of this code has been
re-written and has been sitting in drm-intel-next for a few weeks now.
This (welcome) rewrite will likely be merged in 2.6.37 (but I can't
speak for Chris).
This is a port of this patch:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ickle/drm-intel.git;a=commit;h=e5e408fc94595aab897f613b6f4e2f5b36870a6f
, but on completely different code.
Also this patch is new and didn't see much testing (I tested on 4
different Intel GPUs, belonging only to 2 different families); if it's
not merged for 2.6.36, it won't be for 2.6.37 (the new code will land
first). If that happens, it might not meet conditions to be accepted
in -stable (being in linus' tree first).
Anisse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists