linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] autofs: Only declare function when CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:26:42 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Márton Németh <nm127@...email.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] autofs: Only declare function when CONFIG_COMPAT is defined

On Monday 27 September 2010 21:32:52 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > My initial reaction was to put these into my bkl/vfs tree, but then I noticed
> > that they are against a 2.6.36 bug. Who's taking care of getting them upstream?
> > 
> > - Ian (maintainer)
> > - Arnd (who wrote the broken patch to start with)
> > - Frederic (who pushed the broken patch to Linus)
> > - Andrew (took them into -mm)
> > 
> > I don't care either way, just trying to make sure it gets there and we don't
> > all submit the same patch simultaneously.
> 
> The usual deal: if it turns up in linux-next then I drop it.  If it
> doesn't then I'll merge it into 2.6.37.

I ended up putting them into my bkl/vfs tree after all now.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/