[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101005155552.GB19730@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:55:52 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] Input: add appleir USB driver
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:18:35AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2010, 08:08:22 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> > > But what about the next opener? He'll get a completely spurious
> > > key release event, as the next key is pressed.
> >
> > How does the opening of a device handle relate to a device state?
>
> It doesn't.
>
> > Userspace should expect to see releases without presses (in case they
> > weren't the first client that opened the device).
>
> Yes, but based on sane timing. From the time stamps user space
> would conclude that the key had been pressed at an unknown time
> before open and released at the time the event indicates. Possibly
> it would compute that the key had been held for at least hours.
>
I do not understand. If a client never seen the "press" event and only
saw "release" event it can't make any assumptions about timing. Press
could be a millisecond ago or an hour ago, it just does not know. And
such scenario can easily happen if the client is second to open the
device.
I think the only sane behavior for clients is to ignore release events
for keys that they did not see "down" event for.
-
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists