linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] Input: add appleir USB driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201010050818.35118.oliver@neukum.org>
Date:	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:18:35 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
	"linux-input" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] Input: add appleir USB driver

Am Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2010, 08:08:22 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> > But what about the next opener? He'll get a completely spurious
> > key release event, as the next key is pressed.
> 
> How does the opening of a device handle relate to a device state?

It doesn't.

> Userspace should expect to see releases without presses (in case they
> weren't the first client that opened the device).

Yes, but based on sane timing. From the time stamps user space
would conclude that the key had been pressed at an unknown time
before open and released at the time the event indicates. Possibly
it would compute that the key had been held for at least hours.

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/