[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ENjWQRYitr_kYzmRKgve=CoBf=7Y5KHLJNLfb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 00:05:44 +0300
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@...com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-main <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Hiroshi Doyu <hiroshi.doyu@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] omap: dsp: make the driver actually work
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar <omar.ramirez@...com> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
> ...
>>>
>>> phys_to_virt instead of ioremap should work fine, still need to try
>>> it though.
>>
>> I tried that... Didn't work. I guess we need to flush at some points
>> (since the memory is cacheable).
>
> Hmmm, because my other option was to move the reserved memory outside the kernel, but that involves specifying bootargs again and using dma_alloc_coherent with their restrictions.
Huh, if there's no contiguous memory region reserved, then the driver
is doing dma_alloc_coherent already, but that fails (apparently 5M is
too much). Plus I've read that dma_alloc_coherent is "precious";
shouldn't be used for that.
> If you are working on a different method and need any help let me know.
So, first I wanted to try reserving some region with mem=X boot param,
but that solution is ugly. If that worked, then I wanted ti see if
flushing each time we access that shm memory block works, but in the
process I wanted to reorganize the whole initialization code because
right now it's very ugly and confusing.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists