[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101005210904.GQ2369@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:09:04 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] core kernel fixes
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:15:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > #define rcu_dereference_bh(p) \
> > - rcu_dereference_check(p, rcu_read_lock_bh_held())
> > + rcu_dereference_check(p, rcu_read_lock_bh_held() || irqs_disabled())
>
> Wouldn't that irqs_disabled() check have made more sense inside
> rcu_read_lock_bh_held()?
>
> That's the function that is _supposed_ to check whether bottom halves
> are disabled, no? So why add a workaround for that function being
> buggy/incomplete in one place that uses it?
Good point!!! If the following diff looks good to you, I will get it
tested and pushed.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index 4d16983..0af1dc7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void)
{
if (!debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled())
return 1;
- return in_softirq();
+ return in_softirq() || irqs_disabled();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_read_lock_bh_held);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists