linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] OLPC: Add XO-1 poweroff support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTind-S=vzba56DmkzR2BixLGUyBTqu4rgaMcSf5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:42:59 +0100
From:	Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
To:	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OLPC: Add XO-1 poweroff support

On 7 October 2010 21:09, Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net> wrote:
> Any particular reason why this can't be modular?

Because of the pm_power_off thing.
Also, a similar situation would be encountered with set_suspend_ops().

I don't really understand your suggestion. If we set it to NULL on
module unload then the power off would crash on shutdown, right?

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/