[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101007071226.GA32189@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:12:26 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Jiang <djiang@...sta.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] edac: mpc85xx: Add support for new MPCxxx/Pxxxx EDAC
controllers (fix)
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:00:50AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2010, at 1:37 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> >> @ -1125,7 +1128,10 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_mc_err_of_match[] = {
> >> { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8569-memory-controller", },
> >> { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-memory-controller", },
> >> { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8349-memory-controller", },
> >> + { .compatible = "fsl,p1020-memory-controller", },
> >> + { .compatible = "fsl,p1021-memory-controller", },
> >> { .compatible = "fsl,p2020-memory-controller", },
> >> + { .compatible = "fsl,p4080-memory-controller", },
> >
> > This line should be here ;)
>
> should NOT be here.
Hm. Are you sure? I thought that only L2 cache controller is
not applicable (and based on Scott's comment I removed
the l2 cache compatible entry for p4080). But I guess
memory-controller is somewhat similar to all other 85xx?
If it's not, I can surely prepare a patch that removes
p4080 entry.
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists