linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/18] fs: introduce a per-cpu last

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101008084441.GA17366@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:44:41 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] fs: introduce a per-cpu last_ino allocator

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:22:34AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> writes:
> 
> > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> >
> > new_inode() dirties a contended cache line to get increasing
> > inode numbers. This limits performance on workloads that cause
> > significant parallel inode allocation.
> >
> > Solve this problem by using a per_cpu variable fed by the shared
> > last_ino in batches of 1024 allocations.  This reduces contention on
> > the shared last_ino, and give same spreading ino numbers than before
> > (i.e. same wraparound after 2^32 allocations).
> 
> This doesn't help for Unix disk file systems, so not fully sure why you
> need it for XFS.

Currently i_ino is assigned for every inode allocated using new_inode.
It's pretty stupid as most callers simply don't need it.  But Dave
didn't want to make this series even more complicated than nessecary
and leave sorting this out for later.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/