[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CAF21CE.5000901@atmel.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:51:10 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AT91: Fix power-saving in idle-mode on 926T processors
Russell,
Le 08/10/2010 14:29, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 21:44 Thu 07 Oct , Anders Larsen wrote:
>> According to Atmel, their 926T processors (AT91 post RM9200) requires
>> 'Wait for Interrupt' mode be entered right after disabling the processor clock
>> in order to minimise current consumption when idle, so do both provided we're
>> not running on a 920T (an RM9200).
>>
>> Furthermore, get rid of the #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, since arch_idle()
>> can be turned off completely with the kernel parameter 'nohlt'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>
>> Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>
> please rebase against this branch
>
> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git branch for-rmk
This patch seems already in your "master" branch
(5c189208b606a85b4e97109af70d59f10a42fdfd).
Do you want me to rebase this patch or do you mange merging with "AT91:
fix use of clock disable on idle for AT91x40 devices"
(cb809b1a5ebffca8cf0314b788919989e8e4ab5f) ?
already in your "devel" and "devel-stable" branches?
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists