linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK to recalculate load weights

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinSW-6OXkUeiaB7SZObXWBseJ9+HRRAqVnbrQFL@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:38:14 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK to recalculate load weights

2010/10/11 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>:

> OK, so the problem is that if a RR/FIFO task does s fork() and it has
> SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK set, the child normalization fails to properly set
> the weight?
>
> Does (as Mike just suggested) removing that whole RT clause in
> set_load_weight() work for you?

Yep it sure does! Time to drop some weight.
Sent a new patch for this...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/