linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:14:47 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdike@...toit.com,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, peterz@...radead.org,
	tj@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ()

On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:29:35 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:

> This patch removes __do_IRQ() from user mode linux.

I'd never actually noticed CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ.

What's the plan here?  Are all architectures supposed to me migrating
away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/