linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:23:10 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdike@...toit.com,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, peterz@...radead.org,
	tj@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ()

Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010, 00:14:47 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> What's the plan here?  Are all architectures supposed to me migrating
> away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what?

Yes.

Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt:

What: __do_IRQ all in one fits nothing interrupt handler
When: 2.6.32
Why:  __do_IRQ was kept for easy migration to the type flow handlers.
  More than two years of migration time is enough.
Who:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/