linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010120028570.2909@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:29:27 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jdike@...toit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, peterz@...radead.org,
	tj@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ()

On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:29:35 +0200
> Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> 
> > This patch removes __do_IRQ() from user mode linux.
> 
> I'd never actually noticed CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ.
> 
> What's the plan here?  Are all architectures supposed to me migrating
> away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what?

Yes, that's why __do_IRQ() is deprecated since 3 years.

 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/