[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101012131414.GC20436@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:14:14 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Implement hwpoison on free for soft offlining
> To me, it's no problem if this keep 64bit only. IOW, I only dislike to
> add 32bit page flags.
>
> Yeah, memory corruption is very crap and i think your effort has a lot
> of worth :)
Thanks.
>
>
> offtopic, I don't think CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE and CONFIG_HWPOISON_ON_FREE
> are symmetric nor easy understandable. can you please consider naming change?
> (example, CONFIG_HWPOISON/CONFIG_HWPOISON_ON_FREE,
> CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE/CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE_SOFT_OFFLINE)
memory-failure was the old name before hwpoison as a term was invented
by Andrew.
In theory it would make sense to rename everything to "hwpoison" now.
But I decided so far the disadvantages from breaking user configurations
and the impact from renaming files far outweight the small benefits
in clarity.
So right now I prefer to keep the status quo, but name everything
new hwpoison.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists