[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101013091553.ADB1.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:15:32 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Implement hwpoison on free for soft offlining
> > To me, it's no problem if this keep 64bit only. IOW, I only dislike to
> > add 32bit page flags.
> >
> > Yeah, memory corruption is very crap and i think your effort has a lot
> > of worth :)
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> >
> > offtopic, I don't think CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE and CONFIG_HWPOISON_ON_FREE
> > are symmetric nor easy understandable. can you please consider naming change?
> > (example, CONFIG_HWPOISON/CONFIG_HWPOISON_ON_FREE,
> > CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE/CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE_SOFT_OFFLINE)
>
> memory-failure was the old name before hwpoison as a term was invented
> by Andrew.
>
> In theory it would make sense to rename everything to "hwpoison" now.
> But I decided so far the disadvantages from breaking user configurations
> and the impact from renaming files far outweight the small benefits
> in clarity.
>
> So right now I prefer to keep the status quo, but name everything
> new hwpoison.
ok. I've got it. thanks :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists