[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tkrat.b190ad8b687a549a@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:25:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH unfinished update] firewire: sbp2: parallelize
login/inquiry, reconnect, and shutdown
> So I changed the patch to the simple one below, but suddenly my
> INIC-2430 device has trouble with inquiry in parallel to its two LUNs:
The following modification fixes this mostly, i.e. always when the first
Inquiry attempt to one LUN fails but succeeds on the other. But I had
one occasion just now at which both failed; then that reschedule does
simply lead into the same situation until retry limit.
> Maybe I need ordered per-target workqueues.
No, I actually need per-node ordering. This device, like my other one
and apparently most ones on the market actually keep their SCSI logical
units in separate FireWire units. Currently firewire-sbp2 is not aware
that fw_unit instances reside on the same node.
This is going to be tougher than I hoped. Maybe I need a driver-global
Inquiry mutex. Or move the __scsi_add_device() out of sbp2_login() into
another work which is scheduled to a "single-threaded" workqueue.
--- a/drivers/firewire/sbp2.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/sbp2.c
@@ -982,6 +982,8 @@ static void sbp2_login(struct work_struc
* lu->work already. Reset the work from reconnect to login.
*/
PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK(&lu->work, sbp2_login);
+ if (lu->retries++ < 5)
+ sbp2_queue_work(lu, DIV_ROUND_UP(HZ, 5));
out:
sbp2_target_put(tgt);
}
@@ -1656,7 +1658,8 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("sbp2");
static int __init sbp2_init(void)
{
- sbp2_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue(KBUILD_MODNAME);
+ sbp2_wq = alloc_workqueue(KBUILD_MODNAME,
+ WQ_NON_REENTRANT | WQ_RESCUER, 0);
if (!sbp2_wq)
return -ENOMEM;
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =-=- -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists