[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB4EAA5.5010605@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:09:25 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH unfinished update] firewire: sbp2: parallelize login/inquiry,
reconnect, and shutdown
Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Maybe I need ordered per-target workqueues.
>
> No, I actually need per-node ordering. This device, like my other one
> and apparently most ones on the market actually keep their SCSI logical
> units in separate FireWire units. Currently firewire-sbp2 is not aware
> that fw_unit instances reside on the same node.
>
> This is going to be tougher than I hoped. Maybe I need a driver-global
> Inquiry mutex. Or move the __scsi_add_device() out of sbp2_login() into
> another work which is scheduled to a "single-threaded" workqueue.
More extensive change but probably with simpler end result: Let sbp2_probe
and sbp2_update perform login/scsi_add_device/reconnect directly. sbp2_probe
and sbp2_update are serialized per node, but (since 2.6.36 with cmwq)
parallelized across nodes.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =-=- -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists