linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sound/soc: rename vol to volatile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101013152916.GA20270@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date:	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:29:17 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Peter Hsiang <Peter.Hsiang@...im-ic.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ia.com>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Marroquin <Jesse.Marroquin@...im-ic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound/soc: rename vol to volatile_register as
 appropriate

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 08:27:47AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 16:11 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > If you check the code again you will notice that these functons are all
> > used in ops structures which presents obvious issues when trying to
> > replace with open coded checks.
> > I hope their usefulness is clear given the above.

> There is some value in using consistent
> function styles for table driven and non-table
> driven instances.

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are saying here.  What do you
believe to be inconsistent?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/