[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101014150742.F9EC.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:07:19 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk: fix a wrong accounting of hd_struct->in_flight
Hello,
> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>
> /proc/diskstats would display a strange output as follows.
>
> $ cat /proc/diskstats |grep sda
> 8 0 sda 90524 7579 102154 20464 0 0 0 0 0 14096 20089
> 8 1 sda1 19085 1352 21841 4209 0 0 0 0 4294967064 15689 4293424691
> ~~~~~~~~~~
> 8 2 sda2 71252 3624 74891 15950 0 0 0 0 232 23995 1562390
> 8 3 sda3 54 487 2188 92 0 0 0 0 0 88 92
> 8 4 sda4 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> 8 5 sda5 81 2027 2130 138 0 0 0 0 0 87 137
Hm, this is very nasty and crap.
> @@ -1268,7 +1270,17 @@ static int __make_request(struct request
> * not touch req->buffer either...
> */
> req->buffer = bio_data(bio);
> + src_part = disk_map_sector_rcu(req->rq_disk, blk_rq_pos(req));
> req->__sector = bio->bi_sector;
> + dst_part = disk_map_sector_rcu(req->rq_disk, blk_rq_pos(req));
I think this is wrong. disk_map_sector_rcu() require
rcu read lock held (see function comment). all other call site take
part_stat_lock() before disk_map_sector_rcu() call.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists