lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:44:32 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk: fix a wrong accounting of hd_struct->in_flight

On 2010-10-14 08:07, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> @@ -1268,7 +1270,17 @@ static int __make_request(struct request
>>  		 * not touch req->buffer either...
>>  		 */
>>  		req->buffer = bio_data(bio);
>> +		src_part = disk_map_sector_rcu(req->rq_disk, blk_rq_pos(req));
>>  		req->__sector = bio->bi_sector;
>> +		dst_part = disk_map_sector_rcu(req->rq_disk, blk_rq_pos(req));
> 
> I think this is wrong. disk_map_sector_rcu() require
> rcu read lock held (see function comment). all other call site take 
> part_stat_lock() before disk_map_sector_rcu() call.

It's called under the queue lock with irqs disabled, which implies a
rcu critical section.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ