[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101014.094525.71092814.Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:45:25 +0300 (EEST)
From: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
To: x0095840@...com
Cc: felipe.contreras@...ia.com, tony@...mide.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] iovmm: replace __iounmap with omap_iounmap
Hi Fernando,
From: ext Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095840@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] iovmm: replace __iounmap with omap_iounmap
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:27:36 +0200
> Omap platform is omap_iounmap function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095840@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> index 93a34d9..5489ca9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ void iommu_kunmap(struct iommu *obj, u32 da)
> struct sg_table *sgt;
> typedef void (*func_t)(const void *);
>
> - sgt = unmap_vm_area(obj, da, (func_t)__iounmap,
+ sgt = unmap_vm_area(obj, da, (func_t)iounmap,
Woundn't the above be enough?
Eventually this "iounmap()" calls "__arch_iounmap()" ->
"omap_iounmap()". I don't see any special reason to call
"omap_iounmap()" here for now.
> + sgt = unmap_vm_area(obj, da, (func_t)omap_iounmap,
> IOVMF_LINEAR | IOVMF_MMIO);
> if (!sgt)
> dev_dbg(obj->dev, "%s: No sgt\n", __func__);
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists