[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287046900.29097.161.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:01:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 13:21 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> +static void account_cfs_rq_quota(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> + unsigned long delta_exec)
> +{
> + if (cfs_rq->quota_assigned == RUNTIME_INF)
> + return;
> +
> + cfs_rq->quota_used += delta_exec;
> +
> + if (cfs_rq->quota_used < cfs_rq->quota_assigned)
> + return;
> +
> + cfs_rq->quota_assigned += tg_request_cfs_quota(cfs_rq->tg);
> +}
That looks iffy, quota_assigned is only ever incremented and can wrap.
Why not subtract delta_exec and replenish when <0? That keeps the
numbers small.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists