[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101014200526.GB30831@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:05:26 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@...e.cz>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andr Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@...il.com>,
Jason Wang <jason77.wang@...il.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Serial: BUGFIX: uart_resume_port has an omitted
condition.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:45:57PM +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > > This disparity appeared deliberately in 4547be78. If you need
> > > no_console_suspend and the hardware lets the device in an undefined
> > > state after resume (i. e. PXA270), you need to call subset of the
> > > resume, even if the suspend counterpart was not called. Yes, I can
> > > imagine that it may be a source of problems.
>
> > > It seems that support for no_console_suspend for all devices is becoming
> > > more complicated. I guess that a new driver calls (maybe "save_state"
> > > and "resume_state") or support for no_console_suspend directly in
> > > drivers may be useful.
> >
> > Ok, so I'm guessing that this patch is not to be applied then, correct?
>
> I just compared it with Jason Wang's patches. MyungJoo Ham's patch is
> exactly equal to the PATCH 1/2. So it already has my ACK and it is
> pending as:
>
> serial-core: skip call set_termios/console_start when no_console_suspend
Ah, ok, thanks for confirming this, no need for me to do anything else
then, I like it :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists