lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101015142617.GB25620@basil.fritz.box>
Date:	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:26:17 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: Process to push changes to include/linux/types.h

> 64-bit values align to 4-byte boundaries on some 32-bit architectures like x86 
AFAIK it's only on x86, no other architecture made this mistake in their
32bit ABI. But of course x86 is kind of important ...

> and to 8-byte boundaries on 64-bit architetures.  The new __aligned_64 type 
> enforces 8-byte alignment and so structs containing __aligned_64 values have 
> the same alignment on 32-bit and 64-bit architectures.  No conversions are 
> necessary between 32-bit user-space and a 64-bit kernel.

Rest looks good and could be put into Andrew's comment.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ