[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB8AC80.7090802@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:33:20 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
CC: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.6.36-rc7] mac80211: cancel restart_work explicitly
instead of depending on flush_scheduled_work()
Hello,
On 10/15/2010 09:26 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
>> wireless-testing/wireless-next has already such a patch:
>> "mac80211: cancel restart_work in ieee80211_unregister_hw" (2010-08-25)
>>
>> <http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-next-2.6.git;a=commit;h=258086a48b766d12a500f98834654ffa927ca475>
>>
>> John, can you please push to 2.6.36-rc8?
>> (I know, I am _late_, but I didn't know about any potential problem
>> in the mainline?)
>
> I don't see how either patch would merit inclusion in 2.6.36 at this point.
My patch definitely was aimed for 2.6.37-rc1 or later. I'm not sure
whether the cancel_work_sync() is a bug fix or not but if it hasn't
actually triggered yet, I guess leaving it as-is isn't too bad at this
point.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists