[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287178546.16971.4.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:35:46 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] jump label: Make arch_jump_label_text_poke_early()
optional
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 14:22 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> Really the SPARC code (and any architectures added in the future with a
> well defined optimal NOP) should be doing nothing here as well.
>
> So I could turn the question around and ask: How many empty definitions
> of this thing do you want in the tree?
>
> I will defer to Steven. If he wants to push the empty stubs into all
> the architectures, I will update the MIPS patch and he can remove/revert
> the 'jump label: Make arch_jump_label_text_poke_early() optional' patch.
>
> Let me know which option you would prefer.
On IRC, Thomas Gleixner mentioned a better solution (something I've done
with ftrace). Just add a "weak" stub function. No need to get Kconfig
involved.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists