[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101016014158.GR19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:41:58 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
takata@...ux-m32r.org, linux-m32r@...linux-m32r.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] m32r: restore _BLOCKABLE
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:16:45PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> Commit a7f8388e accidentally removed it...
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/m32r/kernel/signal.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/signal.c b/arch/m32r/kernel/signal.c
> index 7bbe386..cc36fe1 100644
> --- a/arch/m32r/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/m32r/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
>
> #define DEBUG_SIG 0
>
> +#define _BLOCKABLE (~(sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGSTOP)))
> +
Grrr... Sorry, reordering breakage. In the signals tree here I have
static inline void sig_set_blocked(struct sigset_t *set)
{
sigdelsetmask(set, sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGSTOP));
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
current->blocked = *set;
recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
}
and it's used all over the place (including quite a few places where
we currently have sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, set, NULL), which is what
it's equivalent to). With that done, m32r doesn't use _BLOCKABLE
anywhere, so it got removed. And that chunk got picked when I'd been
reordering the queue to pull the arch-specific fixes in front. Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists