linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6a6702dc-7dbb-47a3-a0cf-18c8a65252fe@email.android.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:01:36 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	"Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling

It should.

"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:

> On 10/15/2010 05:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>  On 10/12/2010 01:29 PM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> Commit-ID:  77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
>>> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
>>> Author:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>> AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:37:10 +0200
>>> Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>> CommitDate: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:53:44 +0200
>>>
>>> x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling
>>>
>>> There seems to be more cleanups possible, but that's left to the xen
>>> experts :)
>> This causes the kernel to fail to boot under Xen.  The WARN_ON(res !=
>> irq) triggers and nobody is very happy about the results.
>
>Of course the really interesting question is whether this sparse irq
>rework allows us to hang our extra per-irq information of the irq_data
>structure now, rather than having to maintain all these auxiliary arrays?
>
>Thanks,
>    J

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon any lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/