[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB8EF30.7060504@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:17:52 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq
handling
On 10/15/2010 05:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 01:29 PM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Commit-ID: 77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:37:10 +0200
>> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> CommitDate: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:53:44 +0200
>>
>> x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling
>>
>> There seems to be more cleanups possible, but that's left to the xen
>> experts :)
> This causes the kernel to fail to boot under Xen. The WARN_ON(res !=
> irq) triggers and nobody is very happy about the results.
Of course the really interesting question is whether this sparse irq
rework allows us to hang our extra per-irq information of the irq_data
structure now, rather than having to maintain all these auxiliary arrays?
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists