linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/18] fs: rework icount to be a locked variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101016001533.GL4681@dastard>
Date:	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:15:33 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] fs: rework icount to be a locked variable

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 07:36:43AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > -		atomic_inc(&inode->i_count);
> > +		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> > +		inode->i_ref++;
> > +		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> 
> Why isn't this using iref?
> 
> > +		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> > +		inode->i_ref++;
> > +		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> 
> Same here and in a couple of others.
> 
> Hmm, I guess because the i_lock later covers other things around.
> But it still looks a bit weird.

Ok, I've changed them to iref() calls and convert them to open
coding later on when necessary.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/