[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101016062304.GA10748@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:23:04 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] jump label: Fix module __init section race
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
> > +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
> > @@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ void jump_label_update(unsigned long key, enum jump_label_type type)
> > count = e_module->nr_entries;
> > iter = e_module->table;
> > while (count--) {
> > - if (kernel_text_address(iter->code))
> > + if (iter->key &&
> > + kernel_text_address(iter->code))
>
> Peter, I know you hated this, but the alternative is either:
>
> if (iter->key &&
> kernel_text_address(iter->code))
>
> or break 80 chars. All three seem bad (although I don't mind breaking
> 80 chars for this). But I'll leave it for now.
No, the proper alternative is to move the body of the iteration into a
jump_label_update_entry() inline function ...
Nobody is forcing you to start yet another iteration 4 indentations
deep. We have functions for a reason.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists