[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101016062725.GB10748@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:27:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] perf: Optimize sw events
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 11:16 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 22:34 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/perf_event.h
> > > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h
> > > @@ -1013,15 +1013,17 @@ static inline void perf_fetch_caller_reg
> > > static inline void
> > > perf_sw_event(u32 event_id, u64 nr, int nmi, struct pt_regs *regs, u64 addr)
> > > {
> > > - if (atomic_read(&perf_swevent_enabled[event_id])) {
> > > - struct pt_regs hot_regs;
> > > + struct pt_regs hot_regs;
> > >
> > > - if (!regs) {
> > > - perf_fetch_caller_regs(&hot_regs);
> > > - regs = &hot_regs;
> > > - }
> > > - __perf_sw_event(event_id, nr, nmi, regs, addr);
> > > + JUMP_LABEL(&perf_swevent_enabled[event_id], have_event);
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > +have_event:
> > > + if (!regs) {
> > > + perf_fetch_caller_regs(&hot_regs);
> > > + regs = &hot_regs;
> > > }
> > > + __perf_sw_event(event_id, nr, nmi, regs, addr);
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > OK, so it appears I only compile tested this bit without jump_label
> > support, with that bit added back this horribly fails to compile like:
> >
> > In file included from /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/fault.c:13:
> > /usr/src/linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h: In function ‘perf_sw_event.clone.0’:
> > /usr/src/linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h:1018: warning: asm operand 0 probably doesn’t match constraints
> > /usr/src/linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h:1018: error: impossible constraint in ‘asm’
> >
>
> Ah, figured it out, it needs __attribute__((always_inline)), otherwise
> we end up with multiple keys for one label, which will clealy not work.
>
> I thought we had a __force_inline macro but I can't seem to find that.
It's called __always_inline.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists