[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287309159.1998.146.camel@laptop>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:52:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] perf: use jump_label to optimize the
scheduler hooks
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 22:34 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + JUMP_LABEL(&perf_task_events, have_events);
> + return;
> +
> +have_events:
> + __perf_event_task_sched_in(task);
> +}
OK, so I hate the JUMP_LABEL() interface for it means we have to keep
writing these silly stubs.
How about something like:
#define COND_STMT(key, stmt) \
do { \
__label__ jl_enabled; \
JUMP_LABEL(key, jl_enabled); \
if (0) { \
jl_enabled: \
stmt; \
} \
} while (0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists