linux-kernel - Re: [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 00/12] [RFC tg_shares_up - v1 00/12] Reducing cost of tg->shares distribution

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:38:51 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	pjt@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Bourdon <pbourdon@...ellency.fr>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 00/12] [RFC tg_shares_up -
 v1 00/12] Reducing cost of tg->shares distribution

On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 10:54 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
> The results do sound interesting, could I recommend that you try to
> get 1000 cgroups or so, with half of them as active and half inactive.
> I'd also suggest tracking system and user time at the cgroup level. 

Sure, but do keep in mind that 500 active cgroups will always utterly
suck no matter what you do, it means we do indeed need to iterate 500
cgroups for a lot of scheduler operations.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/