[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101017120933.GM13048@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:39:33 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: pjt@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pierre Bourdon <pbourdon@...ellency.fr>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 00/12] [RFC tg_shares_up -
v1 00/12] Reducing cost of tg->shares distribution
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2010-10-17 11:38:51]:
> On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 10:54 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >
> > The results do sound interesting, could I recommend that you try to
> > get 1000 cgroups or so, with half of them as active and half inactive.
> > I'd also suggest tracking system and user time at the cgroup level.
>
> Sure, but do keep in mind that 500 active cgroups will always utterly
> suck no matter what you do, it means we do indeed need to iterate 500
> cgroups for a lot of scheduler operations.
>
I agree in general, but in my case I've seen nasty things even when
the groups were empty.
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists