linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] perf: use jump_label to optimize the scheduler hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1287310576.1998.151.camel@laptop>
Date:	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:16:16 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] perf: use jump_label to optimize the
 scheduler hooks

On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 11:52 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 22:34 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *task)
> > +{
> > +       JUMP_LABEL(&perf_task_events, have_events);
> > +       return;
> > +
> > +have_events:
> > +       __perf_event_task_sched_in(task);
> > +} 
> 
> OK, so I hate the JUMP_LABEL() interface for it means we have to keep
> writing these silly stubs.

The below seems to actually compile too, awesome! ;-)

---
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/jump_label.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/jump_label.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/jump_label.h
@@ -61,4 +61,14 @@ static inline int jump_label_text_reserv
 
 #endif
 
+#define COND_STMT(key, stmt)					\
+do {								\
+	__label__ jl_enabled;					\
+	JUMP_LABEL(key, jl_enabled);				\
+	if (0) {						\
+jl_enabled:							\
+		stmt;						\
+	}							\
+} while (0)
+
 #endif
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -901,21 +901,13 @@ extern atomic_t perf_task_events;
 
 static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *task)
 {
-	JUMP_LABEL(&perf_task_events, have_events);
-	return;
-
-have_events:
-	__perf_event_task_sched_in(task);
+	COND_STMT(&perf_task_events, __perf_event_task_sched_in(task));
 }
 
 static inline
 void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, struct task_struct *next)
 {
-	JUMP_LABEL(&perf_task_events, have_events);
-	return;
-
-have_events:
-	__perf_event_task_sched_out(task, next);
+	COND_STMT(&perf_task_events, __perf_event_task_sched_out(task, next));
 }
 
 extern int perf_event_init_task(struct task_struct *child);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/