linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Results of my work on memorystick subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <451805.21484.qm@web37607.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>
To:	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Results of my work on memorystick subsystem

--- On Sun, 17/10/10, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com> wrote:

> > 
> > Here is a result of lot of work I did improving the
> memorystick
> > subsystem and its drivers.
> Comments?
> Flames?
> Suggestions?
> 

My opinion is, that in the current form your patches are completely
unworkable.

I suggest a following approach, consisting of 3 clearly separated steps:

Step 1 - a set of functional patches to jmicron driver.
Step 2 - a set of functional patches to mspro driver.
Step 3 - common code elimination (the whole thing is not that large, it
can tolerate some code duplication).

When we done with this, we can discuss whatever cosmetic changes you want
to do (moving stuff around and , possibly, renaming, which I don't see as
necessary at all).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/