[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CBC014D.7070302@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:11:57 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the swiotlb-xen
tree
On 10/17/2010 09:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got conplex conflicts in
> drivers/xen/events.c between several commits from the swiotlb-xen tree
> and several commits from the xen tree.
>
> I am unqualified to fix this mess, sorry. I am dropping the xen tree
> for today (and only not dropping the swiotlb-xen tree because that would
> be too much work).
Argh, sorry, I should have coordinated with Konrad. I'd merged my tree
into linux-next to make sure it was OK, but I guess I overlooked something.
> I wonder, of course, why I have seen nothing in either of these trees
> until today (less than a week before the merge window opens).
I had found Xen regressions that had made it into linux-next and wanted
to sort those out before adding anything else to the mix.
> Please sort this mess out. I will drop the swiotlb-xen tree as well
> tomorrow if nothing has changed.
Will do.
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists