[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101018081520.GA10551@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:15:20 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the msm tree with the arm tree
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:02:07AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> [ Just cc'ing Russell, sorry about that]
>
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:35:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the msm tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/debug-macro.S between commit
> > 08a610d9ef5394525b0328da0162d7b58c982cc4 ("arm: return both physical and
> > virtual addresses from addruart") from the arm tree and commit
> > 46fe5f29e3062f681cc3cf07a604d82396faea89 ("msm: allow uart to be
> > conditionally disabled") from the msm tree.
> >
> > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
Thanks, but I don't think there's much which can be done about these.
Changes such as 08a610d affect all ARM sub-architectures, and as they're
spread across multiple git trees...
I think there's going to be some problems during this forthcoming merge
window.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists