[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287406015.29097.1579.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:46:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add OMAP hardware spinlock misc driver
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:44 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> OMAP4 introduces a Spinlock hardware module, which provides hardware
> assistance for synchronization and mutual exclusion between heterogeneous
> processors and those not operating under a single, shared operating system
> (e.g. OMAP4 has dual Cortex-A9, dual Cortex-M3 and a C64x+ DSP).
I just have to ask... was it really easier to build silicon than to
agree on a spinlock ABI?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists