[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101018124828.GB25148@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:48:28 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, jbaron@...hat.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] jump label: x86 support
* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@...radead.org) wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 09:01 +0000, tip-bot for Jason Baron wrote:
> > +void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
> > + enum jump_label_type type)
> > +{
> > + union jump_code_union code;
> > +
> > + if (type == JUMP_LABEL_ENABLE) {
> > + code.jump = 0xe9;
> > + code.offset = entry->target -
> > + (entry->code + JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE);
> > + } else
> > + memcpy(&code, ideal_nop5, JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE);
> > + get_online_cpus();
> > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > + text_poke_smp((void *)entry->code, &code, JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE);
> > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > + put_online_cpus();
> > +}
>
> hpa, mathieu, what's the status of stop_machine less text poking?
> Because the above basically means we have to disable architecture
> jump_label support for -rt.
hpa got an unofficial answer from Intel OTC, that states the stop_machine-less
text poking procedure is valid.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/12/300
We are still waiting for the "official" blessing though.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists