[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287424348.2359.1.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:52:28 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, w@....eu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [Patch] Limit sysctl_tcp_mem and sysctl_udp_mem initializers
to prevent integer overflows.
Le lundi 18 octobre 2010 à 12:43 -0500, Robin Holt a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 02:50:32PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
> > Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:24:06 -0500
> >
> > > Subject: [Patch] Limit sysctl_tcp_mem and sysctl_udp_mem initializers to prevent integer overflows.
> > >
> > > On a 16TB x86_64 machine, sysctl_tcp_mem[2], sysctl_udp_mem[2], and
> > > sysctl_sctp_mem[2] can integer overflow. Set limit such that they are
> > > maximized without overflowing.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
> >
> > Robin please resubmit this with the SCTP bits included.
>
> David,
>
> I did not mean to blow you off. I was not going to resubmit because
> Eric's patch is the preferred direction. I had been given an indication
> that my patch was preferred, but that indicator changed.
>
Maybe there is some misunderstanding.
My patch was for net-next kernels (not before 2.6.37), while yours was
applicable to previous kernels.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists