[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010181430220.15782@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Cleanup TIF value gaps in shift range
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I agree in general, but this is stupid as hell. No fcking interface
> should exposed kernel internal flag bits just as hex values and no
> fcking luser space should rely on it to be a subject of no change.
>
> Seriously, if we can't even change TIF_* bits anymore then we are
> doing something wrong. That's a pure kernel internal affair and
> subject to change.
>
I agree, and when I added them to the show_state() dumps, I should have
probably enumerated the bits of interest to userspace and printed them
much like taint flags: use 'M' for my bit of interest, TIF_MEMDIE, which
gives access to memory reserves. We care a _lot_ about detecting hung
tasks that have that bit set because it usually indicates a VM problem
where we've allowed complete depletion of memory reserves. There's no
other way to detect that, so we need to export TIF_MEMDIE somehow and if
that's by doing (ti->flags & TIF_MEMDIE) ? "M" : "" then that's fine by
me. I hope we can do that before changing its value, though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists