[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CBE251A.6070603@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:09:14 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
nhorman@...driver.com, scott.a.mcmillan@...el.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup the convoluted softirq tracepoints
On 10/19/2010 04:05 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>> JMP/Jcc does have a consumer -- the IP -- and actually measuring shows
>> that it is much, much worse than NOP and other dummy instructions.
>
> But how does JMP vs Jcc compare?
>
*As far as I know* they're the same, except of course that a direct JMP
never mispredicts.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists